Crack in the Egyptian Pyramids..
When I first heard of the lady in this post, I was amazed and
delighted. You see, whenever the ‘experts’ are
confounded and proven wrong, I always give three cheers and all credit to the
person who caused the confusion.
One of the best examples is the Coelacanth. All the experts stated that it was an extinct prehistoric fish.
The only problem was that nobody told the fish as it was found happily
swimming about in South
African waters in 1938. It is now comparatively common
but conveniently known by the ‘experts’ as
a ‘living fossil’. It seems that all one needs to be an expert
is that one agrees with all the other experts in the field. Woe betide the person who tries to break the
circle....
However, as the heading of this little story suggests, it has
nothing whatsoever to do with fish. Some excellent scientific work
which will be explained later, poses some very important and intriguing questions.
Such as:......
Did the
ancient Pharaohs of Egypt
use such drugs as cocaine, cannabis and tobacco or were they merely used in
preparing bodies for mummification?
Evidence discovered around 1992 and published by the German Scientist, Svetla Balabanova would strongly suggest that they did in fact do one, the other or even both............
Evidence discovered around 1992 and published by the German Scientist, Svetla Balabanova would strongly suggest that they did in fact do one, the other or even both............
Not very interesting? On the contrary, for if they did it throws some
very large spanners into the works and suggests that history will once again
have to be rewritten. You see, the coca plant from which cocaine is
produced, the cannabis and the tobacco plant were not natural to the Eastern side of the Atlantic
– they were from the Americas,
in particular Colombia, Peru
and Bolivia.
As I said, it prompts the questions – how did such drugs get to Egypt?
Did the Egyptians have trade
with the South Americans? Were the Americas discovered thousands of years
before Columbus, the Vikings or even by my pet favourite, Ireland’s Saint
Brendan.
The reason I really like this story is the fact that when Dr Balabanova published her findings, world-renowned Egyptologists poo-pooed her theory and
in fact refused to even discuss or debate it. Claims were
made that earlier examiners had contaminated the mummies; that any suggestion
that the Egyptians had any contact with America was preposterous and that Balabanova’s tests were flawed.
However, the good lady did not panic. She merely
quietly went about proving her findings by examining mummies from near and far
museums. She used several different methods of testing and indeed,
the vast majority proved positive.
Nine mummies were evaluated and all showed signs of cocaine
and cannabis use and eight showed signs of nicotine. The
concentrations were not as high as modern day users.
It was then argued by the ‘experts’ that the mummies may not have been ancient but may have
been ‘faked’
mummies. This was not uncommon in early Victorian times when many European museums were
searching for specimens. It was also thought by the same Victorians
that ‘ground up tissue from
mummies’ was a curative potion for certain ailments as the dark
powder resulting was thought to have contained ‘bitumen’.
In order to fulfil the fraudulent demand at that time,
Egyptians used to make up the orders by making modern mummies. It was a fairly simple process.
Bodies would be buried in sand and treated similar to that which the ancient
ones had been treated. The museums did not in certain cases take
much care in checking the provenance. Neither did those producing
the ‘miracle cure’.
Once again Balabanova quietly got on with her research and
began checking records for the mummies she had examined. In all
cases they proved to be authentic. She made several different forms
of testing to prove her argument. These included tests which are
fully accepted in present day Courts
of Law. Companies who have ‘No drug’ policies for their employees also
use the same standard. Once again Balabanova was proven
correct........
For all intents and purposes, it would appear that Balabanova’s
and subsequent further testing by others give at least a 75% chance that her
theory is correct and that the drugs mentioned are present in the mummies.
If this theory is fully accepted, a can of worms is
dramatically opened.
How did those drugs get to the Egyptians?
It is arguable that they did not come via the Atlantic, as evidence of silk has been
found in ancient times. In that case, the experts are willing to
accept that the silk may have come overland from China and traded with the Egyptians.
This would require the drugs to have crossed the Pacific. There is an accepted
theory that this had been done in ancient times and that a form of trade had
existed in that sphere.
However, the ‘experts’
in Egyptology still hold their stance
and continue to not even debate whether or not there was pre-Columbian contact
between the New and the Old Worlds.
It would appear to be naive to assume that only modern man is capable of
certain feats and that ancient man was not. There are numerous
examples which show that what ancients did is highly comparable with modern
times.
The debate is still open on whether or not there was
pre-Columbian contact with the Americas but I for one accept it as
true. With modern methods I believe that sufficient evidence will
eventually come to light proving it as fact.
Meanwhile, Balabanova quietly gets on with her investigations
and continues to prove her theory. At the same time, the ‘experts’
refuse to accept that they could be wrong for if they were to do so now, it
would show that they had closed minds and were not open to more advanced
thinking.
The quest for discovery, to find new worlds, to go where no
man has even been before is not a modern experience. The peoples of
the past were not mere cave dwellers who were afraid to experiment and travel
to new places.
I have no
doubt whatsoever that they were even more daring than those mountain men of the
old American West who continued to travel to where no man had ever set foot
before.
Long may such adventures and discoveries
continue...............
Addendum: I was checking to see if there was any update on the theory and found on Wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Columbian_trans-oceanic_contact_theories
There are now numerous theories, some brilliant and some fanciful. Well worth a read if interested.............Mike..
------------Mike-------------
No comments:
Post a Comment